Pelley On PGA Tour Alliance, Equipment Rule Change Discussion
/
MorningRead.com’s Alex Miceli talks to Keith Pelley about the European Tour and several top issues in the game. You’ll have to read between the (many!) lines and even then Pelley isn’t saying much.
On November’s hastily-announced PGA Tour strategic alliance in lieu of a deal with the Premier Golf League:
I'll give you an example that even something along the lines – and we didn't ask them to do this – our “Angry Golfers” [video]. They posted [a link] on their social sites, and then the next thing you know, we’re up to 3 million views. That never would have have happened before. We have a number of strong work streams working. In a COVID year, you can't meet face-to-face, and meeting face-to-face is always better, but that's changed. I said that our competitor became our partner, and I meant it. I just didn't think it would happen this quickly and that we would cooperate and work together on every single aspect of our business on both sides and both parties.
I passed that along to all our people, and obviously [PGA Tour commissioner] Jay Monahan has done it, as well. So, very optimistic. There's nothing concrete that we can tell you, but we are promoting, our production people are talking, our marketing people are talking, our commercial people are talking, scheduling people are talking.
They’re talking. They’re marketing. So far, it’s just an agreement to share Tweets for now. Given that it was a 10% stake in European Tour Productions and he PGA Tour is starting their own tournament production unit, presumably those ties will become stronger soon?
On the equipment chatter, Pelley will not reveal a European Tour position.
The way I look at it is, the USGA and the R&A are our partners and their role is to do exactly what they are: evaluating all facets of the game. The relationship that the six of us developed during the COVID period will serve us well during this time. We will follow closely, speak behind closed doors with our respective partners, not make any comment public, not give any opinion at this particular time because it's not our position to do so, and I feel very strongly on that because that would defeat the purpose of what we're trying to do. When it comes time to make the announcement, all the comments have been evaluated. We are in contact with them all the time, with the USGA and the R&A. They call it the comments; we call it the listening stage. That's the role. You have to put out some type of concepts and ideas and thoughts to generate the comments. That's what it is. I have no opinion on any of the rules and regulations at this particular time.
