Phone-In Rules Officials, Sticklers For Timeliness Big Losers In Rules Changes

All three major rule modifications make great sense, and with the Ball in Hazard rule for those poor souls who leave a shot in a bunker but feel the need to rake before extricating themselves.

Here's the USGA release:

    •    Ball Moving After Address (Rule 18-2b). A new exception is added which exonerates the player from penalty if their ball moves after it has been addressed when it is known or virtually certain that they did not cause the ball to move. For example, if it is a gust of wind that moves the ball after it has been addressed, there is no penalty and the ball is played from its new position.

A major blow to the at-home rules officials.

    •    Ball in Hazard; Prohibited Actions (Rule 13-4). Exception 2 to this Rule is amended to permit a player to smooth sand or soil in a hazard at any time, including before playing from that hazard, provided it is for the sole purpose of caring for the course and Rule 13-2 (improving lie, area of intended stance or swing or line of play) is not breached.

Now Rory can kick the sand in frustration and still not be penalized, only this time no inquiry will be necessary.

    •    Time of Starting (Rule 6-3a). The rule is amended to provide that the penalty for starting late, but within five minutes of the starting time, is reduced from disqualification to loss of the first hole in match play or two strokes at the first hole in stroke play. Previously this penalty reduction could be introduced as a condition of competition.

Another no-brainer.

"Kinder and gentler" was Ryan Herrington's takeaway on the latest changes.

R&A Buries The Lede: Major Amateur Status Changes Unveiled...

...seven paragraphs after leading with the changes to the hole-in-one prize issue, which was impacting one in every 20,000,000 million golf shots hit annually.

Contrast this with the USGA press release, which is clean, to-the-point and focused on getting out the most important news (while not even mentioning the hole-in-one nonsense).

Here's the R&A version, brought to you by Rolex:

THE R&A ANNOUNCES NEW RULES OF AMATEUR STATUS FOR 2012

Significant changes include allowing unlimited hole-in-one prizes

First-ever unified, worldwide code for amateur status

24 October, 2011, St Andrews, Scotland: Amateur golfers will be allowed to play for unlimited hole-in-one prizes under revisions to the Rules of Amateur Status announced today by The R&A.

Blah, blah, blah...if you want a giggle, go read the full release online with Suzann Pettersen's quotes about how this will make the game better. Now, jump SEVEN paragraphs to the story the governing bodies are oddly shying away from.

Those who will notice the biggest changes to the rules are elite amateurs preparing to make the difficult transition to the professional game.

Players will now be able to enter into an agreement with an agent or sponsor as long as they do not receive any financial gain while still an amateur.

Now agents in the U.S. don't have to pretend they are not talking to college players! Here's the actual news:

Rules have also been relaxed on subsistence payments paid through national golf unions.

Say goodbye to international players coming to America for college. And say hello world America. How long before the U.S. has to start its own national golf union to keep up with the rest of the world?

Rickman explained: “The rules on contracts now reflect the modern game and adopt a much more realistic and common sense approach.

“Similarly, the rules on subsistence expenses should help the support of deserving talent wherever it may emerge across the golfing world.”

Tom Lewis, who recently turned professional after an amateur career that included winning the Silver Medal at this year’s Open Championship as well as being part of the victorious 2011 Walker Cup team, welcomed the changes.

He said: “It is an important change because some players are forced into turning pro early just because of financial difficulties.

I feel like I'm reading something out of Dickens! These poor, starving, Hugo Boss-clad children!

Anyway here's the actual language:

Rule 2-2 Professionalism; Contacts and Agreements
National Golf Unions or Associations – New Rule 2-2 (a) is added to allow an amateur golfer to enter into a contract and/or agreement with his national golf union or association, provided he does not obtain any financial gain, directly or indirectly, while still an amateur golfer.

Professional Agents, Sponsors and Other Third Parties – New Rule 2-2 (b) is added to allow an amateur golfer, who is at least 18 years of age, to enter into a contract and/or agreement with a third party solely in relation to the golfer’s future as a professional golfer, provided he does not obtain any financial gain, directly or indirectly, while still an amateur golfer.

And the subsistence expenses...

Rules 4-3 Subsistence Expenses
New Rule added to allow an amateur golfer to receive subsistence expenses to assist with general living costs, provided the expenses are approved by and paid through the player’s national golf union or association.

This is huge news for international golf, and yet it gets second billing to hole-in-one prizes. But why?

The complete text of all changes to the Rules of Amateur Status and video summaries of the changes can be found at www.randa.org

Rolex’s relationship with The R&A dates back to 1978 when the company first began to support The Open Championship. In addition to the Rules of Golf, Rolex also support the Amateur Championship, the Walker Cup, the Boys Amateur Championship and the Junior Open. Rolex also sponsors the British Golf Museum and this year became the presenting patron of the Senior Open Championship.

And thank you for that message from our sponsor.

Speaking of irony, the R&A's other release from the day touts the publishing of one rule book for the world (same fonts too, just different spellings for words like colour!). Yet the two governing bodies send out two entirely different press releases.

Don't Look For Tiger To Use The Belly Putter Anytime Soon

In Emily Kay's item on James Driscoll reluctantly looking to the belly putter, there was this about his fellow Sean Foley accolyte and Medalist member.

Despite the mass migration to what are quickly becoming conventional blades, Driscoll believes one golfer fans will never see with one is Tiger Woods.

“He was giving me a hard time for practicing with it a couple of weeks ago,” said Driscoll, who shares Woods’ swing coach, Sean Foley, and is a long-time member of Woods’ new course, Medalist Golf Club in Hobe Sound, Fla. “He said he’d never go to the long putter. He has tried it and says he just can’t stroke it.”

When's A Whiff A Whiff?

Check out the YouTube video while you can because I'm sure the men with the little red phones in Ponte Vedra are working to get it taken down.

Ryan Ballengee explains what happened Saturday with Kevin Na in Las Vegas:

On the 15th tee Saturday at TPC Summerlin, Kevin Na was in the middle of his downswing when he decided not to hit the golf ball. He pulled up his swing and finished it by missing over the top of the ball. It seemed Na had whiffed but he didn’t, according to PGA Tour officials.

Na told officials and reporters he felt his weight transfer was amiss and would lead to a hooked tee shot, so he missed.

“I’ll take it back; it feels decent, and my transition is what I’m always working on,” Na said. “It’s always my bad habit is I get quick. And on the way down my transition doesn’t feel right, and I try to stop, and obviously it’s impossible for me to stop. The only way for me to stop is I have to come up and go over the ball.”

I think I'll remember this next time I whiff one! Thanks Kevin!

I believe Woodward and Bernstein would call this a non-whiff whiff.

Even Captains Get The Local Rules Sheet Reading Blues

I didn't pay much attention to the Walker Cup caddie flap, where GB&I's Jack Senior harmlessly had his club pro brother Joe caddy for him. The local rules sheet stipulated this was a no-no, and as Ryan Herrington explains in a Golf World Monday item, neither captain knew this because they had not read the one age (two-sided!) local rules sheet.
Read More

The Best Reminder Of Why Long Putter Anchoring Is A Farce

Bob Carney posts some recent GolfDigest.com/Golf World letters and shares this from Hank Schlautmann of Port Huron, Michigan.

Years ago Craig Stadler lost $33,333.33 for placing a towel under his knees. I think they called it a stance improvement. Belly-putter users are cheaters as far as I'm concerned. That isn't golf. It should be called by it's real name (BELLY GOLF).

Phil: "We've outlawed the paddle grip for crying out loud, I don't know why; that was legal for three decades."

Alex Myers focused on Phil's comments today on not ruling out the belly putter, but I of course was jumping for joy when he noted that the USGA did outlaw the dreaded, horrible, blatantly criminal paddle grip, which was nothing more than a slight indentation at the top of the grip, and all because putting geniuses Stockton, Archer and Crenshaw used one. (Actually that's not entirely true, but I just wanted to get a nasty email from Frank Hannigan at some point today.)
Read More

The Inevitable First PGA Championship Question: The Long Putter Debate

Now that a major has been won by a player receiving the full benefits of a long putter, the governing bodies can no longer point to the major losing streak as evidence of the long stick's lack of influence. Now that someone has actually used one to win a major, it will only make reversing past decisions that much more difficult.
Read More

The Schwartzel Ruling, Re-evaluated

For Golf World Monday, I looked into Friday's Schwartzel ruling and talked to a few people, including someone on the ground when it happened. While I still believe official Jon Brendle's actions were sound and his initial reluctance to grant relief was speaks to the legitimacy of Schwartzel's claimed clubhead path, I've come to a different conclusion about this and other sprinkler head relief situations.

Check it out. It's only 220 words long. (Link works for non-subscribers too.)

Interesting aftermath photo courtesy of Allan Henry at GolfChronicles.

“He and his caddie didn’t think he’d addressed his ball, but they didn’t know the definition of the rule.”

Rex Hoggard gives us a little more detail on the Joost Luiten DQ:

"He took his stance which means you’ve addressed the ball and then the ball moved which is a penalty,” said PGA Tour rules official Jon Brendle who was involved in a lengthy conversation with Luiten adjacent Muirfield Village’s chipping green after the ruling. “He and his caddie didn’t think he’d addressed his ball, but they didn’t know the definition of the rule.”

Luiten violated Rule 18-2b and failed to add two strokes to his score on the hole. Because he had already signed his scorecard he was disqualified.