"Their disqualification on the eve of the first women’s major of the year before the first official shot had been struck was another spoonful of bad publicity for the L.P.G.A. Tour."

I'm not sure I can buy that take from the New York Times' Karen Crouse regarding the disqualification of Helen Alfredsson, Maria Hjorth and Sangsang Feng from the Nabisco for missing their pro-am times. While Alfredsson's situation as an alternate does sound a bit more unusual, I don't see anything wrong with the LPGA's policy. In fact, it sounds like they make it a pretty simple set-up for alternates like Alfredsson.
Read More

"If Wie was lying, she’d be the one to have to look in the mirror when she puts on her makeup and know she did."

Thanks to reader Tom for John Vander Borght's follow up to his original post on Michelle Wie and her questionable explanation for grounding her club, which he's apparently caught a little flak for defending. I think he makes a fair rebuttal point even though I find her explanation dubious.
Read More

"Quite frankly, one of the things I think we learned in 2008 and ’09 is to really respect that.”

Beth Ann Baldry reports on Mike Whan's first LPGA player meeting. It sounds like the Commish has learned that Plan 2010, or whatever it was the Brand Lady tried to shove down sponsor throats, is best kept on the shelf until times are better.

When Whan was asked how he’d describe the tour these days, he said “re-emerging.” They’re in the business of renewals, and he’s reaching out to all the partners who parted ways in the past several years.

“We’re tied to the business partners we’re with,” he said. “If they’re hurting, we’re hurting. Quite frankly, one of the things I think we learned in 2008 and ’09 is to really respect that.”