The Mauling At Medinah is Mike Clayton’s label for the shock and awe at the 2019 BMW, where Justin Thomas and many others overwhelmed the rain-softened 7600 yard course.
(Random thought interruption here: I thought it was the improved agronomy that meant tons of roll, yet Medinah was a sponge…anyway, we now return to our regularly scheduled distance post).
After looking at past Medinah majors and what scores were needed to succeed, Clayton writes:
Justin Thomas was unquestionably brilliant this past week at Medinah, where he answered all the questions the course posed. His 263 represents amazing golf, but is it a full 24 shots more compelling than Graham’s 287 was 44 years ago?
The question for the game, for the professional tour and the administrators in New Jersey and St Andrews is: How will you manage the technological assault on the game’s great courses and a game so out of balance at the top level?
Or do they abdicate their responsibility to restore the balance MacKenzie and his great contemporaries understood and built?
The evidence of what we watched from Medinah is the golf isn’t so interesting when the questions are so easily answered with power and wedges.
Much was made of Adam Scott’s comments calling out designers and officials to set courses up to require shaping the ball, but that’s tough to do overnight.
But it was his comment as reported by Evin Priest about drivers that accelerated his previous public statements about driver head size.
Scott warned superstar drivers may no longer stand out, such as Australia's Greg Norman and American Davis Love III did in previous eras.
"The driver is the most forgiving club in the bag now; it's just swing as hard as you can and get it down there far," he said.
"It's not a skilful part of the game anymore and it's really unfair for some guys who are great drivers of the golf ball.
"I don't think their talents are showing up as much as they should."
And there was Tiger as well at Medinah, echoing comments he’s been making all year:
“Now you just pull out driver, bomb it down there and you’re looking for three to four good weeks a year,” Woods said. “That’s how you play. It’s not the consistency, it’s not about making a bunch of cuts. It’s about having three, four good weeks a year. That’s the difference. Guys understand that.”
These comments have all presumably been made to the USGA and R&A as part of their distance insights research. No one mentions the ball much these days—calm down Wally!—some because they are paid not to, while others genuinely believe it’s maxed out.
So are we seeing a shifting focus to reducing the driver head size for elite players and would it make a difference? There is only one way to find out, once the manufacturers stop kicking and screaming about the massive R&D expenditures needed to knock 75 cc’s off their current models.
Taylor Made has a jump start with this mini-driver released earlier this year. Anyone test it out on a launch monitor?
